Property is also a very interesting way to look at this. When parents register their children, do they hand over the children as property to the GRO or is it simply the name and registration information that becomes the property of the GRO? Finally, this office acts on the basis of the provisions of the 1965 Act. In particular, sections 1 to 4, which define the central organisation of the registrar in Scotland. The word custody is not used in the Registration of Births, Deaths and Marriages (Scotland) Act 1965. As noted above, birth registration is vested in the Registrar of Scotland under the provisions of the 1965 Act. Are you acting under the legal defense of registrars under the Law Dictionary? Can you confirm whether your office is legally acting according to the legal definition of your name? The lawdictionary.org defines REGISTER as; Rights that a king has by virtue of his prerogative. I regret that it is not possible for you to claim custody of your birth registration. Birth registers are public records and official evidence that an event was recorded at some point in the past in a particular place and, as stated above, all birth registrations are the property of the Registrar General for Scotland under section 32(2) of the Births Registration Act 1965, deaths and marriages (Scotland). For more than a century, Black`s Law Dictionary has been the gold standard of the language of law. Today, it is the most cited law book in the world. By Editor-in-Chief Bryan A.
Garner, the world`s leading legal lexicographer, the 11th edition is the most reliable and comprehensive legal dictionary ever published. It seems that my parents informed of my birth and shared my name today when I had nothing to say. Now it is clear that the registration of my birth is in the custody of the GRO/State. What is the legal definition of “deprivation of liberty” in legal terms and what does it mean to be in detention and how can she be released from prison? SUBJECT: VITAL STATISTICS – MEANING OF THE TERM “REGISTRANT” WITH RESPECT TO THE REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS OF CHILDREN IN THE STATE AT: F. Eugene Tubbs, MD, Representative, 45th District, Merritt Island Created by: Bjarne B. Andersen, Jr., Assistant Attorney General QUESTIONS: 1. What does “registrant” mean within the meaning of subsections 382.17(1) and 382.35(2) and (3)? F.S.? 2. Is there a conflict between the provisions of section 382.17 (1) F.S. and the provisions of section 382.35(2), F.S., and, if so, which section governs the disclosure of a person`s status of legitimacy? Summary: The word “inscribed” as it appears in para. 382.17(1) and 382.35(2) and (3), F.A., designates or otherwise designates the person whose birth is registered or registered in that state – not the person who registers that birth. The provisions of para. Subsections 382.17(1) and 382.35(2), which restrict access to or disclosure of information about a child`s lawful status, are not contradictory because section 382.17 governs the content and form of the entry and section 382.35 governs the limited disclosure of such recorded information that is declared confidential by law and is therefore an exception to the Public Records Act under paragraph 119.07(2)(a).
F.S. ON QUESTION 1: The provisions of chap. 382, F.S., establish a Central Bureau of Vital Statistics, and one of the principal functions of the Bureau is to register “the birth of every child born in this State.” See page 382.15. As you mentioned in your application, the word “registered” is defined in Black`s Law Dictionary as “someone who registers.” Black`s Law Dictionary, 4th ed., p. 1449; similar definitions can be found both in Webster`s 3rd International Dictionary (1966) at p. 1912 and in the Random House Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged Ed., p. 1912. 1208. On first reading, given the definitions of “registered” accepted above, the use of the word “registered” appears to apply to a person who registers the birth of a child with the Bureau of Vital Statistics. A closer look at the relevant provisions of chap. 382, op. cit.
O., however, to refer to the birth register of the person whose birth is registered rather than to the parties making the registration. See pp. 382.15, 382.16 and 382.17. Therefore, with respect to the question of who is a registrant, it is my responsibility to examine Parliament`s obvious intent in using this term, when in fact there is ambiguity because of its use in the chapter. 382, cf. Beebe v. Richardson, 23 So.2d 718 (fla. 1945); Adams v. Gordon, 260 So.2d 246 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1972). The word declarant is not purely technical and its meaning may well depend on the compound in which it was used in connection with the registration of the birth of a child.
See Alsop v. Pierce, 19 So.2d 799 (fla. 1944). In sections 382.17(1) and 382.35(1) and (2), to which you refer, as well as in section 382.17(2), the word “declarant” is always followed by the phrase “when he is of age.” The purpose of such a reservation, when it is of age, is either to characterize, limit or exclude a possible reason for misinterpretation of the word inscribed. See State v. State Racing Commission, 112 So.2d 825 (fla. 1959). If the term registered refers to a person who has registered the birth of a child, as opposed to the application of the term to a child whose birth is registered, the use of the term when the term is of full age seems to be of little use to apply to an adult parent or to a physician, midwife or other person, who is required by law to present birth certificates or to report the fact of such births. See p. 382.16, f.
p. Given the ordinary meaning of the word “holder”, there seems to be some ambiguity in its use in para. 382.17(1) and 382.35(1) and (2), supra. O., if the same thing were to be taken literally. However, when applied to the subject matter of your request, which is the disclosure of legitimacy status, the ordinary meaning of the inscribed word may well conflict with the apparent legislative intent of this Act. If this does happen, the context must give way to the legislative purpose of the law, even if the result appears to be a deviation from the literal and apparently accepted meaning of the inscribed word. See Beebe v. Richardson, op. cit. cit., and Adams v. Gordon, op. cit.
The whole issue of disclosure revolves around the status of legitimacy. With regard to legitimation, § 382.21 (2), F.S., the legislature used the term inscribed as follows: “Upon receipt of the legitimation report of a clerk of the court. or after receiving a certified copy of a final judgment or legitimation judgment, together with all necessary information, from a declarant or the parents of a declarant, or upon receipt of proof of marriage from a person`s parents after that person`s birth, and the registrar presents a new birth certificate.
Recent Comments